I have choose two animated video. The first animation title is Hambuster (HD) Most epic Animated film and Hamburger moon. One criteria has been set based on relativism. Relativism is the concept that points of view have no absolute truth or validity, having only relative, subjective value according to differences in perception and consideration.
The Hambuster (HD) Most epic Animated film tells what the happens when our food rebels against us. This story also tell about the burger monster eat all people around the town. The beginning of story is a man buy a burger and want to eat. When he want to eat the burger, the burger want to eat him back. In this story have a own message to tell the audience who’s watching this film. This movie is very awesome and when audiences watch this movie they can feel scary and disgusting and also messed up.
Then, for the second animation, the story about the hamburger at McDonald and the burger change to be a monster. This animation is hard to understand and the storyline is not interesting but the character is nice. After that, the message in animation like floating because the ending is not interesting. When u watch this animation, u don’t feel like to laugh for a long times.
The animation of Hambuster (HD) Most epic Animated film here is fantastic, and the directors wear their influences on their sleeves, even going so far as to put some great, B-movie homages in the credits. The story is simple enough, one could almost say well-worn, but the team is talented and well versed enough in the tropes of over-the-top horror/comedy to do it justice. The diner scene, in particular, is a highlight, featuring a wonderful attention to facial expression and an absurd amount of viscous, red fluid. At the very least, it holds the distinction of being one of the few films featuring a protagonist in the possession of multiple, swaying chins.
The audiences should be able to feel scary,remember and shocked from the beginning to the end video the animation of Hambuster after along times as compared to Hamburger moon. First animation, feel scared because the burger monster want to eat all people and all around that place and it catch up until it got. From that, it will attract viewers to watch the animation and they will not disappointed because it is something worth to be watch and they will get feel scary throughout the scene. The storyline, plot, are the ingredient to the successful animation.
After that, the first animation have a nice render and the building like real and interesting because this animation make in 3d as compared to second animation. The second animation, the background is not real and not interesting because it make in 2d and more to improve.
In additional, The audiences should be able to feel want to watch for the second times and not bored because the storyline is fun and have a climax when the fat boy run away from a burger monster as compared to Hamburger moon, it feel so bored and also that the movement of character like stiff and so slow.
Here, I would like to argue with people with objectivism views as they are always grounded in reality and belief in moral truth. We cannot use subjectivism because the doctrine that knowledge is merely subjective and that there is no external or objective truth. Emotivism,it is also not suitable in making aesthetic evaluation because it is an ethical theory which regards ethical and value judgements as expressions of feeling or attitude and prescriptions of action, rather than assertions or reports of anything.
As a conclusion, relativism is more suitable for Aesthetic evaluation, I think we have to conducted from relativism and not from subjectivism,objectivism and emotivsm. Relativism is most suitable criteria to make an evaluation. It is because relativism is the doctrine that knowledge, truth, and morality exist in relation to culture, society, or historical context, and are not absolute.Points of view have no absolute truth or validity, having only relative, subjective value according to differences in perception and consideration.Truth is always relative to some particular frame of reference, e.g. a language or a culture.
